As it turns out, nature, in fact, is, in terms of life at this star, a forever more and more integrative, more and more organizing, "things-being-always-more-organized-than-before" type of system.

And again, it goes on Forever like that!

This "Chaos" nonsense is just another variation on the "you can't really know, because there's nothing up there to know" theme.

'Chaos' is yet another argument used for keeping ideology scientifically undiscussed, unconscious, and hidden, which, of course, is the only way a reactionary ideology can survive.

Hidden, stealth-like ideology, the right-wing's only prayer.

I say, drag that monster right-wing ideology out into the open, and, when placed beside this web-site's paradigm, like the dracula of old, the reactionaries will summarily, dissolve, in the clear light of day.

Which, on the world scale, extrapolated directly into: 'when a weaker person attempts to expose actual abuse, German 'medical' 'science' has 'proven' that they're making it all up, and anyway, that they like it that way'.

And it's little wonder why those very children, who raged inside at being abused, tightly packed, when they grow up, and when coupled with a pervasive mumbo jumbo bourgeois propaganda, they become so sure that they are "supposed to" reenact that abuse, on the grand scale. Et voila! Holocaust.

Indeed, down, perhaps that very street in 1897 Vienna where Freud delivered his infamous retraction, to the cheers and applause of the parents of the Holocaust, indeed, perhaps even at that very moment, a little boy named Adolf, was, I presume, getting his lights beaten out, while the great (anti-) 'scientists' were specifically informing him, and his ENTIRE generation, that, the way nature works is: "When you are weak, you are to be abused and lied about; and when you are strong, you are to abuse, and lie about it." Bourgeois Gospel, down to this very day!

I can only wonder what someone would make of an observer, standing across on that very street in 1897 Vienna, looking back and forth at the two simultaneous scenes, the beating at the home or in the street, and the applause for denial of it, at The Institute, and seeing, in their mind's eye, the horrors of millions of corpses in The World War, and at Auschwitz and elsewhere in the decades to come.

Would that connection be seen as the ramblings of a crazy idiot? a pathetic paranoid? an archetype Ritalin/Prozac candidate?

Or that of an intelligent, sane, and helpful person.

Could such a connection, and a flash of the horrors to come, be accurately anticipated in the first place? or would it have just been an ordinary random crazy thought, among thousands, to be expected of a paranoid; nothing special.

And, Ahem, How Do You Tell which it is? Accurate, life-saving awareness? Or random nonsense. At first blush, or without context, it certainly could be either, more likely the latter.

Again, How Do You Tell?

That matter, the individuals of the general population being able to tell accuracy from inaccuracy, and helpfulness from harmfulness, as universally self-evident to the cognitive portion of each person's mind, or almost universally self-evident, is, surely by my lights, The, Single, Greatest, Political, Issue, Of Our Time.

Well, the most likely continuation from those 1897 events, if left unmitigated, which, for the most part, is indeed what happened, certainly could not have been predicted via 'complexity' 'theory', nor 'chaos' 'theory', nor any of the other right-wing formulations currently in vogue. Operative perhaps, at some very high, or very low logical level, they are entirely 'out of the loop' so to speak, regarding how life works - this bioecosystem and everyone in it - regarding how life works at this star.

Overlaid onto life, they come out to: "you can't really make predictions", and anyway, "one thing can't make that big a difference", or, "some unforeseen thing will make all the difference", and besides, "whatever happened, was inevitable anyway"(!??!!!) or some such. Not to mention the ultimate in bourgeois sociopathology: "You don't really want to know, anyway".

In fact, we can, and do all the time, make predictions, high and low, with very high likelihood of accuracy; There are one-way-or-the-other, "decisive factors", it comes up all the time; One can foresee, and plan, comprehensively, with, again, a high degree of likelihood of accuracy, despite unforeseen possibilities; Some things are very likely, but 'inevitability' is not part of the workings of this bioecosystem; and, of course, If we need to know, in order to solve problems of harm to humans, and while avoiding endangerment or violation, then we can know, and we want to know.

So anyway, am I implying that child abuse leads to Holocaust? Oh no! Not at all! You don't understand.

I am Stating, Explicitly, that child abuse Causes Holocaust. The single biggest factor; a one-way-or-the-other, decisive factor. Any kind of abuse. And in this context, by child, I mean into a person's twenties.

And people wonder why these allegedly "academic" 'disputes', can get so heated; it's because, at bottom, there are so often, tens, or hundreds, of millions of lives at stake, and whole generations, in health or despair, hanging on the outcome . . . That's why they can get so heated.

Darwin knew it, Pasteur knew it, Freud (spit!) knew it, Bertie Russell and Al Einstein knew it, Lennon was flashing on it, Malcolm knew it, Marie Curie knew it, and I know it too.

Whole generations, and tens of millions of lives, hinging on the outcome of what is falsely alleged to be a mere "academic" 'dispute'.

Those caretaking, accuracy-seeking, communist neuro-ions just gotta' be muscled down, from the inside, mafia-style.

Instant high level fascism in a cute little pill. Ain't that clever?"

So. Should we develop a commie pill, in retaliation? No, I don't think so. We don't need it; very conveniently, us communists already have god, mother nature, and dna on our side. Best I can tell, anyway.

I mean, that's why they have to roll their satanic formula up into a pill, isn't it? - because they don't have god on their side. Seems to me anyway.

I suppose it's the latest Nazi German 'science' derived twist - in fact of course, twisted, as to be expected - the latest twist on the old McCarthyite scam; this time though, the McCarthyite chill is cleverly administered in a pill, in grade school, straight to the CNS, no bothersome sorting through of who the deranged ones really are.

Very clever, them Nazis. I mean, stupid!, very very stupid at the high level of course, imbeciles, but at the low level, of how to, in turn, imbecilize a whole population, very clever.

When the German Nazi Party's base of operations - the Gestapo and SS - were brought into the U.S. councils of power after the war, inspiring that deranged and grotesque Nazi housewarming party known as Hiroshima ('Welcome Home' said a beaming Dulles and the Truman administration to Gehlen's men), and engineering an archetype German Nazi style 'witch hunt', 'McCarthyism', to destroy detection facilities and thus avoid exposure, they then adapted the "black-magic-'high'-level-hoax" to "don't-look!-because-there-is-no-scientifically-discernable-high-level-in-the-first-place!-hoax".

The liberals of the day, tragically, accepted the deal - they agreed to kill off the whole idea of leftist ideology altogether (leaving the fascist idea fundamentally intact, hanging like a dagger over the entire body politique), in exchange for no more subpoenas, arrests, or executions, and even forcefully passing on that deal to the SDS of my own generation.

Apparently, the reactionaries broke their 'no executions' half of contract, at Dallas in '63, although, perhaps it was Kennedy himself who broke the contract, with his 'new frontier' idea, which, I for one, thought coded into 'new ideology'.

At any rate, unfortunately, the still terrified liberals had become too comotose to remember what they'd signed, continuing to enforce their "no ideology" half of the deal, in fact, with a vengence. (And even so, losing Martin, Bobby, Walter, and plenty more in the years to come.)

Indeed, in the early days of the 60's, there was a famous argument between the old, still-McCarthy-shocked liberals, and the brash new generation, up there on Riverside Drive somewhere. From what I heard, apparently, Hayden and a couple of others argued back, in the moment that is, but, thoroughly knuckled under over the years. As it turned out, they all did, (except Malcolm of course); they all knuckled under to that anti-ideology, and anti-high-level-comprehensive-science stuff, down to this very day.

In deleting the whole idea of developing a clear, scientific, thoroughly consistent, crystalline, and cognitively self-evident progressive high level ideology; in deleting the very idea of a tangible, clear-light-of-day, self-evident-to-any-person system of understanding, in deleting the idea of a clear, consistent, scientific, and overt overall frame of reference; in deleting that whole idea, Black Smoke becomes No Hope.

Again, archetype, with the Nazi-derived COINTELPRO operation of the Nixon years, I presume including Rehnquist and co., finishing the job, via their toxic, anti-ideology and disassociative tentacles branching through the women's movement, academia, the large foundations, alternative movements, and the African community . . . not to mention media and 'pop' 'culture'.

And, of course, COunter INTELligence is quite literally what it was, no metaphor, no joke; it was a method of intellectual and social disorientation specifically designed by the German Nazi Party of the 1930's to destroy the physical intelligence of any human being it touched. "How To Turn A Person's High Level Intelligence Into Smoke, Mirrors, and Monsters", straight from the original German.

You think I'm foolin'? Exaggeration? Hyperbole? Uh huh. Well, maybe. Ok. But, think again.

(Christopher Simpson is one particularly authoritive, establishment-based chronicler of the 'Notorious', postwar Nazi personnel and ideology relocation and transfer of national base from Germany to the U.S.)

(And . . . a Hollywood aside . . . I'd always wondered that perhaps Ingrid had caught some flash of what she was really being used for, in the overall, as exemplified in that famous film, and that was the real reason, deep down, why she turned away . . . even Ingrid, in all her famous apolitical naďveté, even Ingrid couldn't stand the smell . . . and, I presume, that's also the real reason why the Republicans hated her so much, and destroyed her for it . . . right-wing terror of exposure, at base, as usual, despite the ever handy 'scandal' cover story . . . I suppose one could say, that, in terms of the terror of exposure that they - perhaps even inadvertently - struck in the right-wing, as manifest in the clinically insane and criminally deranged reaction of the Republicans and the media, I suppose one could say that Ingrid Bergman was the Bill Clinton of 1951 . . .)

Well, in the end, it just might turn out that I understate . . . it happens sometimes . . .

But anyway, there it is . . .

Voila! Hoax-Nation, direct from the original 30's Nazi German, the infamous ideology of the Gestapo, "smoke-and-mirrors-and-a-high-level-vacancy", The Genuine Article, direct from the alien source, and still goin' strong, hoax-nation, two whole generations later, right here in river city, and again, right down to this very day.

Did the Italians and Greeks vote for Truman or Churchill? Did the Guatemalans or Iranians vote for Eisenhower? The Chileans for Nixon? The Timorese for Ford? The Granadans for Reagan? The Iraqis for Bush? Did the Vietnamese, who took five million killed, really vote for Lyndon Johnson? Gee, I musta missed that . . .

I suppose it's sort of like the old Ancient Greece idea of democracy - one porker voter per fifty slaves . . .

It certainly does seem that, aside from The Absolute Exception of the occasional Democratic Party president such as Mr. Clinton, the usual American definition of democracy, at home, and especially abroad these past fifty years, has been, not 'rule by the people', oh no! but rather, 'rule by the anti-people.'

In fact, they needed singular-reality science, life-and-death, and they had it, cognitive, intelligent, rational, mathematical, singular reality science as we know it, up and down the logical levels.

In fact, as it turns out, the whole idea of anti-scientific hocus-pocus "belief" systems, as life's high-level understandings, was the deranged and satanic fabrication of 'the west' and their conquerors, overlaid into local understandings, and brutally imposed world-wide, alongside the determined and systematic destruction and burning of indigenous, universal-singular-reality-based science.

As best I can tell, intuition, which is generated far more strongly and directly from within women in particular, as a matter of gender-based, genetically determined make-up, is designed for reading people, and society, on the ground, so to speak; sensing social things essentially, as they stand.

Regarding reading overall patterns of nature, an entirely different set of abilities are required, these being the deliberate accumulation of what I call internal "gridwork" - information gathering, and information organizing skills and structures - abilities for which are not in any way gender-based.

When the entire society, and the people in it, are operating in hoaxotoxological relation to the basic patterns of nature, intuition by itself has little to say about what nature's basic patterns are.

Intuition about people and society, as they stand, while certainly being a vital - and decisive - life-giving, life-saving skill and ability under any and all circumstances, does not however, identify overall understandings of work-out-well/work-out-poorly in nature, nor right and wrong altogether.

Again, that takes non-gender-based, deliberately built, internal, cognitive gridwork - culled of course, like its 'intuition' sister but in a different way, culled from the world at large.

They're not playing with a full deck, not even half a deck, in the demand - or supply - department.

A 'supply-and-demand' system that actually, comprehensively, and accurately accounted for actual, healthy, truly desired, truly helpful human demands, is called communism.